Bjørn Ransve
Pale heart
1975, oil on canvas
60 x 50 cm
When all is
subtracted, what is left but the object itself? Is there hope in a brutal, grey
horizon? Or does it just bring structure to the painting? Structure versus pure
organic form. The pale, transparent colors surrounding the object are giving off
indications that it is somehow at rest, even when free floating. The background
brings up associations to works of
Rothko. But the background has a function to the
composition: to embed and contrast the heart. Hide and conceal.
But the heart – it
is left lifeless. It is frozen in time and space. What a mare for an organ that
should be warm, pumping, pouring red blood into the body. Giving restless, vibrant
life. Now, at rest against colors of earth and maybe fog. Is there a sky, a higher
dimension, potential of salvation and freedom? And, there is earth: death and
the potential for new life. No matter how barren the land might seem. So there
is hope. A heart gives hope. Standing out at the center of the painting and at
the same time dissolving into the background. A dissolving, pale heart? A heart
without the function of a heart. Faint, distant but with a strong presence. The
painting of a heart, heart of the painting, the heart of a painter? Attempting
to fix form and idea and expelling feelings and emotions. Are the composition
an expression of a barren artistic landscape inhabited only by the visiting
spirit of the painter? Is this the modern reflection on "The
scream" by Munch? Is it a self-portrait or a
portrait of despair of how our attitude towards our surrounding has left it both
pale and exhausted, passing the pain on to the observer?
No comments:
Post a Comment